home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: gos.ukc.ac.uk!njh
- From: njh@ukc.ac.uk (Niki Hemmings)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: The March Amiga?
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 96 11:22:06 GMT
- Organization: University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.
- Sender: njh@ukc.ac.uk
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <14339@gos.ukc.ac.uk>
- References: <19960108.77A4120.F5EA@obscurity.pd.mcs.net> <4dqc2l$34c@news.jhu.edu> <14294@gos.ukc.ac.uk> <4duiev$pc0@news.jhu.edu>
- Reply-To: njh@ukc.ac.uk (Niki Hemmings)
- NNTP-Posting-Host: gos.ukc.ac.uk
-
- In article <4duiev$pc0@news.jhu.edu>,
- Zsolt Szabo <robodude@deanwong.rad.jhu.edu> wrote:
- >In article <14294@gos.ukc.ac.uk>, Niki Hemmings <njh@ukc.ac.uk> wrote:
- >>Right, fair enough, it's not a replacement for true 16 bit, but how do you
- >>work out that it's not even 14 bit?
-
- >I think that has been discussed quite a few times here over the past few
- >months. I personally don't >know< why it isn't 14 bit, but the general
- >consensus was that the SNR more likely resembled 12 bit or so.
-
- Interesting, I must've missed these discussions. Would anyone like to
- comment on why this is? A hardware innacuracy in the volume control
- presumably?
-
- Nik.
-